
The recent rebranding of Myspace is notable in many ways, but it’s also a good example of genuinely good work that shouldn’t be so rare and notable.
Unfortunately design is one of the professions in which amateurs are increasingly commonplace. Though all they’re really doing is what used to be called ‘desktop publishing’.
Such aesthetic crimes are the result of getting anyone with a GCSE in art and a computer to bash out a logo, and is particularly prevalent for online business start-ups. The process typically becoming a combination of safe, obvious ideas and a distinct lack of simplicity that leaves projects largely doomed, concepts ultimately dumbed-down and logos eventually replaced.
This is where the likes of these are born:

Myspace though, with this much-needed rebrand, have bucked the trend, especially for an online-only company and (though it’s not absolutely perfect) got some proper design work done that could be genuinely effective, memorable and long-lasting.
The logo itself
The concept is great. Timeless, memorable and instant, it uses just the right amount of humour and tells a story that explains the brand in a surprising and understandable way.
It is flexible and customisable, and can become a point of interaction for users: the relaunched site has a feature that lets you create your own version of the logo and submit it to a public gallery. But, simpler than that, it explains that Myspace is now about possibilities and discovering, rather than just being friends and sharing pictures.




Identities and logos need to be unique and simple in order to stand out and take on the character of the entity they represent. Next to the simplistic obviousness of the other social media logos (and 90% of all logos), Myspace now has that.

However, this rebrand is an effective one not just because it replaces a terrible logo with a great one (and is backed up by a coherent, consistent identity and updated website) but because it also signals a switch to focusing on music and events rather than being ‘a place for friends’ as the old slogan proclaimed. This is crucial because it may enable it to more happily co-exist with facebook. And it’s also important because to a large extent they’re doing it properly in terms of design.
Wonky type
Though the logo concept is brilliant, the treatment of the type is unsympathetic and quite bizarre, and is particularly evident in the version of the logo that features the full name. Not only does it appear to be set in a mixture of at least two typefaces (or a heavily mangled Berthold Akzidenz Grotesk), but the size of some letters seems to have been altered. The s is squashed and appears too short and light next to the p, the y is incredibly ugly, and all the edges have been strangely curved. It almost looks like it’s been ‘auto-traced’ in illustrator.

This results in a ‘fuzzy’ effect at small sizes, and appears to be just a fun indulgence on the part of the designer.
Even apart from the ugly type, this version of the logo seems quite unnecessary and only serves to undermine the ‘other’ version: either ‘my____’ works or it doesn’t, they shouldn’t need one that makes it more clear. Using this in some places may hinder the rebrand hugely. Its existence just seems very conservative and worried.

Essentially, Myspace has grown up. And though it’s a shame about the wonky lettering, and the version with the full name, it’s a huge improvement.
